1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the
reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different
from your expectations?
I have never been aware of corporate
entrepreneurship. It is a great strategy to implement for businesses that
already have reputable brands. Working from within the company can make into an
even more successful venture.
Social entrepreneurs is a new concept to me
as well, quite surprising to read of individuals who specialize in addressing
the root causes of social problems.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading
that was confusing to you.
The idea of I – Teams was a little confusing
to me, what is the need for both corporate entrepreneurs and I-teams within the
same firm?
How do you correlate company success with
social progress if we as a people, have different perspectives and beliefs of
what right and wrong is?
3) If you were able to ask two questions
to the author, what would you ask? Why?
Is there any research indicating that
working from within the company, innovatively can result in growth?
When addressing needs and challenges, what
makes a social entrepreneur “politically correct” with the topic they address
with their own beliefs?
Does a neutral party have a better, less
subjective, view of the of a firm’s logistics rather than someone that has been
around all aspects of the venture?
4) Was there anything you think the author was
wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
There is nothing that I disagreed with,
however, it was unusual to read about the prospective of the author. Interested
how a new concept can bring all new ideas to mind.
